Daily ISP report

Friday 9 October 2026

Superloop — UNI-D1 on nbn FTTP

Midnight to midnight, Australia/Perth · Browse all reports

Packet loss0.0866%9,723 of 11,231,987 packets
Data coverage100%0 endpoint-minutes with gaps
Endpoints won0 / 13Lowest average latency
Avg latency rank2.31Across all endpoints
Incidents948Loss or coverage events
Counter resets0Agent restarts excluded from loss
By endpoint

Latency and packet loss, past 24 hours

Min, average and max are the headline numbers. The percentiles sit beside them because a single spike moves an average — p95 means 95% of packets were faster than this.

EndpointMinAvgMax p50p95p99Jitter LossCoverage
Perth best 1.6ms 3.6ms 289.1ms 2.3ms 3.0ms 42.5ms 1.11ms 0.0051% 100%
Sydney 47.4ms 49.3ms 334.8ms 48.0ms 48.7ms 88.5ms 1.10ms 0.003% 100%
Singapore 196.1ms 198.1ms 483.7ms 196.7ms 197.4ms 237.3ms 1.12ms 0.0259% 100%
Seoul 176.9ms 179.2ms 464.1ms 177.9ms 180.4ms 218.4ms 1.21ms 0.0179% 100%
Tokyo 146.4ms 148.4ms 434.7ms 147.0ms 148.7ms 187.2ms 1.16ms 0.0475% 100%
Los Angeles 236.7ms 238.8ms 530.2ms 237.4ms 238.9ms 277.5ms 1.17ms 0.3794% 100%
Chicago 240.2ms 243.2ms 527.3ms 240.9ms 260.3ms 281.6ms 1.11ms 0.1133% 100%
Paris 265.9ms 268.4ms 553.7ms 266.6ms 277.2ms 307.0ms 1.16ms 0.0104% 100%
Frankfurt 272.6ms 275.5ms 561.9ms 274.1ms 276.3ms 314.9ms 1.11ms 0.302% 100%
Amsterdam 272.8ms 276.6ms 1,020.4ms 274.5ms 282.0ms 316.6ms 1.13ms 0.0549% 100%
London 287.6ms 292.0ms 574.9ms 289.5ms 303.6ms 331.2ms 1.10ms 0.0905% 100%
Stockholm 307.3ms 311.0ms 596.4ms 308.8ms 316.4ms 349.9ms 1.11ms 0.0733% 100%
Sydney2 47.6ms 49.6ms 335.0ms 48.2ms 48.9ms 88.5ms 1.11ms 0.0022% 100%
Loss timeline

24 hours, five minutes per cell

No loss< 0.01%0.01 – 0.1%0.1 – 1%> 1%No data
Perth
Sydney
Singapore
Seoul
Tokyo
Los Angeles
Chicago
Paris
Frankfurt
Amsterdam
London
Stockholm
Sydney2
00:0006:0012:0018:0024:00
Incidents

Worst events of the day

Consecutive minutes with packet loss or missing data, ranked by packets lost.

WindowEndpointDuration Packets lostLossCoverage
11:15 – 11:19 Los Angeles 4 min 858 35.75% —
11:05 – 11:07 Los Angeles 2 min 488 40.667% —
10:55 – 10:58 Los Angeles 3 min 480 26.667% —
10:48 – 10:51 Los Angeles 3 min 479 26.611% —
11:21 – 11:26 Los Angeles 5 min 289 9.633% —
10:37 – 10:41 Los Angeles 4 min 279 11.625% —
14:13 – 14:14 Los Angeles 1 min 264 44% —
17:54 – 17:56 Stockholm 2 min 250 20.833% —
17:54 – 17:56 Amsterdam 2 min 241 20.083% —
17:54 – 17:56 London 2 min 220 18.333% —
21:24 – 21:26 Frankfurt 2 min 188 15.667% —
03:55 – 03:57 Frankfurt 2 min 187 15.583% —
Over the day

Latency by endpoint

Perth
0134
Superloop
Sydney
0193756
Superloop
Singapore
074148222
Superloop
Seoul
067134202
Superloop
Tokyo
056112168
Superloop
Los Angeles
091183274
Superloop
Chicago
098195293
Superloop
Paris
0104208312
Superloop
Frankfurt
0103207310
Superloop
Amsterdam
0106211317
Superloop
London
0114228342
Superloop
Stockholm
0119237356
Superloop
Sydney2
0193756
Superloop
Methodology

How these numbers were produced

Every ISP in this report is measured on identical hardware, with an identical probe configuration, through the same nbn FTTP NTD at the same premises, over the same time window. Each ISP terminates on its own UNI-D port.

  • ProbeUDP to port 1337, 10 packets per second per endpoint, 1000ms timeout.
  • BucketCounters aggregated in 60-second buckets.
  • LossPacket loss is the sum of reset-safe counter deltas. Buckets where a counter decreases are treated as an agent restart and excluded rather than counted as loss.
  • CoverageCoverage is delivered samples divided by expected samples. Missing data is reported as a gap, never as zero loss.
  • Percentilesp50/p95/p99 are computed over the full day of samples, not averaged from buckets. Approximate (t-digest) quantiles.
  • TimeoutsA sample with latency <= 0 or null is a timeout.
  • RankingEndpoints are ranked ordinally. No weighted composite score is used.
  • Ingest delay75s ingest settling delay applied before a day is generated.

Scope. This is a single-premises measurement against one nbn point of interconnect. It reflects each ISP’s backhaul, peering and congestion as experienced at this location on this date. It is not a nationwide comparison, and results at other locations may differ. All four UNI-D ports share the same physical fibre and GPON access path, so access-network conditions affect every ISP equally and cancel out of the comparison.

Generated 2026-10-10T00:16:23+08:00. The complete underlying dataset for this report is published as JSON.