Daily ISP report

Wednesday 30 September 2026

Ozot — UNI-D2 on nbn FTTP

Midnight to midnight, Australia/Perth · Browse all reports

Packet loss0.0207%2,326 of 11,231,987 packets
Data coverage100%0 endpoint-minutes with gaps
Endpoints won12 / 13Lowest average latency
Avg latency rank1.23Across all endpoints
Incidents650Loss or coverage events
Counter resets0Agent restarts excluded from loss
By endpoint

Latency and packet loss, past 24 hours

Min, average and max are the headline numbers. The percentiles sit beside them because a single spike moves an average — p95 means 95% of packets were faster than this.

EndpointMinAvgMax p50p95p99Jitter LossCoverage
Perth 1.6ms 2.5ms 148.0ms 2.3ms 3.0ms 7.7ms 0.63ms 0.0086% 100%
Sydney best 42.7ms 43.7ms 205.9ms 43.5ms 44.8ms 49.1ms 0.71ms 0.0081% 100%
Singapore best 167.1ms 167.9ms 944.0ms 167.6ms 168.3ms 173.1ms 0.65ms 0.0091% 100%
Seoul 228.1ms 229.0ms 574.6ms 228.7ms 230.8ms 234.6ms 0.72ms 0.0059% 100%
Tokyo best 146.0ms 146.8ms 335.2ms 146.6ms 147.5ms 152.0ms 0.66ms 0.0162% 100%
Los Angeles best 180.0ms 180.8ms 359.5ms 180.6ms 181.9ms 186.2ms 0.70ms 0.0681% 100%
Chicago best 219.0ms 221.5ms 394.8ms 222.2ms 223.0ms 227.6ms 0.63ms 0.0095% 100%
Paris best 203.9ms 204.7ms 1,014.8ms 204.5ms 205.2ms 209.8ms 0.65ms 0.006% 100%
Frankfurt best 207.9ms 208.6ms 335.5ms 208.4ms 209.1ms 214.1ms 0.63ms 0.0097% 100%
Amsterdam best 212.1ms 212.9ms 355.6ms 212.7ms 214.3ms 218.3ms 0.65ms 0.0427% 100%
London best 209.9ms 210.7ms 372.4ms 210.4ms 211.2ms 216.2ms 0.63ms 0.0117% 100%
Stockholm best 229.4ms 230.5ms 384.2ms 230.2ms 231.2ms 235.8ms 0.62ms 0.0642% 100%
Sydney2 best 42.7ms 43.9ms 225.7ms 43.6ms 45.0ms 49.2ms 0.72ms 0.0094% 100%
Loss timeline

24 hours, five minutes per cell

No loss< 0.01%0.01 – 0.1%0.1 – 1%> 1%No data
Perth
Sydney
Singapore
Seoul
Tokyo
Los Angeles
Chicago
Paris
Frankfurt
Amsterdam
London
Stockholm
Sydney2
00:0006:0012:0018:0024:00
Incidents

Worst events of the day

Consecutive minutes with packet loss or missing data, ranked by packets lost.

WindowEndpointDuration Packets lostLossCoverage
18:23 – 18:24 Los Angeles 1 min 278 46.333% —
11:35 – 11:36 Los Angeles 1 min 256 42.667% —
02:56 – 02:57 Stockholm 1 min 69 11.5% —
03:12 – 03:13 Stockholm 1 min 67 11.167% —
02:15 – 02:17 Stockholm 2 min 59 4.917% —
20:42 – 20:44 Amsterdam 2 min 44 3.667% —
20:42 – 20:44 Stockholm 2 min 42 3.5% —
22:07 – 22:09 London 2 min 37 3.083% —
22:13 – 22:15 Tokyo 2 min 34 2.833% —
22:07 – 22:09 Tokyo 2 min 32 2.667% —
22:13 – 22:17 Stockholm 4 min 26 1.083% —
22:13 – 22:17 Amsterdam 4 min 24 1% —
Over the day

Latency by endpoint

Perth
0123
Ozot
Sydney
0163349
Ozot
Singapore
063126188
Ozot
Seoul
086171257
Ozot
Tokyo
055110165
Ozot
Los Angeles
068135203
Ozot
Chicago
083166250
Ozot
Paris
077153230
Ozot
Frankfurt
078156234
Ozot
Amsterdam
080160241
Ozot
London
079157236
Ozot
Stockholm
087173260
Ozot
Sydney2
0173350
Ozot
Methodology

How these numbers were produced

Every ISP in this report is measured on identical hardware, with an identical probe configuration, through the same nbn FTTP NTD at the same premises, over the same time window. Each ISP terminates on its own UNI-D port.

  • ProbeUDP to port 1337, 10 packets per second per endpoint, 1000ms timeout.
  • BucketCounters aggregated in 60-second buckets.
  • LossPacket loss is the sum of reset-safe counter deltas. Buckets where a counter decreases are treated as an agent restart and excluded rather than counted as loss.
  • CoverageCoverage is delivered samples divided by expected samples. Missing data is reported as a gap, never as zero loss.
  • Percentilesp50/p95/p99 are computed over the full day of samples, not averaged from buckets. Approximate (t-digest) quantiles.
  • TimeoutsA sample with latency <= 0 or null is a timeout.
  • RankingEndpoints are ranked ordinally. No weighted composite score is used.
  • Ingest delay75s ingest settling delay applied before a day is generated.

Scope. This is a single-premises measurement against one nbn point of interconnect. It reflects each ISP’s backhaul, peering and congestion as experienced at this location on this date. It is not a nationwide comparison, and results at other locations may differ. All four UNI-D ports share the same physical fibre and GPON access path, so access-network conditions affect every ISP equally and cancel out of the comparison.

Generated 2026-10-01T00:16:09+08:00. The complete underlying dataset for this report is published as JSON.