Daily ISP report

Tuesday 29 September 2026

Ozot — UNI-D2 on nbn FTTP

Midnight to midnight, Australia/Perth · Browse all reports

Packet loss0.019%2,129 of 11,231,987 packets
Data coverage100%0 endpoint-minutes with gaps
Endpoints won12 / 13Lowest average latency
Avg latency rank1.23Across all endpoints
Incidents445Loss or coverage events
Counter resets0Agent restarts excluded from loss
By endpoint

Latency and packet loss, past 24 hours

Min, average and max are the headline numbers. The percentiles sit beside them because a single spike moves an average — p95 means 95% of packets were faster than this.

EndpointMinAvgMax p50p95p99Jitter LossCoverage
Perth 1.6ms 2.4ms 107.1ms 2.2ms 2.9ms 7.6ms 0.58ms 0.0027% 100%
Sydney best 42.6ms 43.7ms 163.5ms 43.5ms 44.8ms 49.1ms 0.67ms 0.0069% 100%
Singapore best 167.1ms 168.2ms 1,026.6ms 168.0ms 169.2ms 173.5ms 0.60ms 0.0209% 100%
Seoul 228.0ms 229.1ms 592.4ms 228.6ms 230.6ms 234.5ms 0.69ms 0.0041% 100%
Tokyo best 146.0ms 146.8ms 215.4ms 146.6ms 147.3ms 151.9ms 0.59ms 0.0372% 100%
Los Angeles best 180.0ms 180.8ms 487.1ms 180.6ms 181.6ms 186.0ms 0.64ms 0.0456% 100%
Chicago best 219.0ms 219.7ms 713.6ms 219.5ms 220.2ms 224.9ms 0.58ms 0.0103% 100%
Paris best 203.9ms 204.7ms 361.4ms 204.5ms 205.1ms 209.9ms 0.60ms 0.0091% 100%
Frankfurt best 207.9ms 208.6ms 371.1ms 208.4ms 209.1ms 213.8ms 0.58ms 0.0076% 100%
Amsterdam best 212.1ms 213.0ms 382.7ms 212.7ms 213.4ms 218.1ms 0.61ms 0.0757% 100%
London best 209.9ms 210.6ms 354.3ms 210.4ms 211.1ms 215.7ms 0.58ms 0.0072% 100%
Stockholm best 229.4ms 230.5ms 386.2ms 230.3ms 231.1ms 235.9ms 0.58ms 0.0134% 100%
Sydney2 best 42.8ms 43.8ms 208.8ms 43.6ms 44.9ms 49.0ms 0.66ms 0.0057% 100%
Loss timeline

24 hours, five minutes per cell

No loss< 0.01%0.01 – 0.1%0.1 – 1%> 1%No data
Perth
Sydney
Singapore
Seoul
Tokyo
Los Angeles
Chicago
Paris
Frankfurt
Amsterdam
London
Stockholm
Sydney2
00:0006:0012:0018:0024:00
Incidents

Worst events of the day

Consecutive minutes with packet loss or missing data, ranked by packets lost.

WindowEndpointDuration Packets lostLossCoverage
21:27 – 21:29 Amsterdam 2 min 482 40.167% —
13:02 – 13:08 Los Angeles 6 min 310 8.611% —
11:43 – 11:45 Tokyo 2 min 278 23.167% —
09:59 – 10:01 Singapore 2 min 101 8.417% —
19:30 – 19:31 Los Angeles 1 min 71 11.833% —
21:21 – 21:23 Amsterdam 2 min 52 4.333% —
20:49 – 20:50 Amsterdam 1 min 50 8.333% —
22:50 – 22:52 Stockholm 2 min 44 3.667% —
14:23 – 14:24 Chicago 1 min 27 4.5% —
12:41 – 12:42 London 1 min 27 4.5% —
12:41 – 12:43 Stockholm 2 min 23 1.917% —
12:41 – 12:42 Singapore 1 min 21 3.5% —
Over the day

Latency by endpoint

Perth
0123
Ozot
Sydney
0163349
Ozot
Singapore
063126189
Ozot
Seoul
087173260
Ozot
Tokyo
055110165
Ozot
Los Angeles
068136204
Ozot
Chicago
082164246
Ozot
Paris
076153229
Ozot
Frankfurt
078156234
Ozot
Amsterdam
080159239
Ozot
London
079157236
Ozot
Stockholm
086172258
Ozot
Sydney2
0173350
Ozot
Methodology

How these numbers were produced

Every ISP in this report is measured on identical hardware, with an identical probe configuration, through the same nbn FTTP NTD at the same premises, over the same time window. Each ISP terminates on its own UNI-D port.

  • ProbeUDP to port 1337, 10 packets per second per endpoint, 1000ms timeout.
  • BucketCounters aggregated in 60-second buckets.
  • LossPacket loss is the sum of reset-safe counter deltas. Buckets where a counter decreases are treated as an agent restart and excluded rather than counted as loss.
  • CoverageCoverage is delivered samples divided by expected samples. Missing data is reported as a gap, never as zero loss.
  • Percentilesp50/p95/p99 are computed over the full day of samples, not averaged from buckets. Approximate (t-digest) quantiles.
  • TimeoutsA sample with latency <= 0 or null is a timeout.
  • RankingEndpoints are ranked ordinally. No weighted composite score is used.
  • Ingest delay75s ingest settling delay applied before a day is generated.

Scope. This is a single-premises measurement against one nbn point of interconnect. It reflects each ISP’s backhaul, peering and congestion as experienced at this location on this date. It is not a nationwide comparison, and results at other locations may differ. All four UNI-D ports share the same physical fibre and GPON access path, so access-network conditions affect every ISP equally and cancel out of the comparison.

Generated 2026-09-30T00:16:07+08:00. The complete underlying dataset for this report is published as JSON.