Daily ISP report

Wednesday 23 September 2026

Superloop — UNI-D1 on nbn FTTP

Midnight to midnight, Australia/Perth · Browse all reports

Packet loss0.0509%5,718 of 11,231,987 packets
Data coverage100%0 endpoint-minutes with gaps
Endpoints won1 / 13Lowest average latency
Avg latency rank2.69Across all endpoints
Incidents702Loss or coverage events
Counter resets0Agent restarts excluded from loss
By endpoint

Latency and packet loss, past 24 hours

Min, average and max are the headline numbers. The percentiles sit beside them because a single spike moves an average — p95 means 95% of packets were faster than this.

EndpointMinAvgMax p50p95p99Jitter LossCoverage
Perth best 1.5ms 3.4ms 166.7ms 2.2ms 2.8ms 41.6ms 1.13ms 0.0028% 100%
Sydney 47.3ms 49.3ms 209.3ms 48.0ms 48.7ms 87.6ms 1.13ms 0.0127% 100%
Singapore 195.9ms 197.9ms 355.0ms 196.6ms 197.4ms 236.1ms 1.17ms 0.0388% 100%
Seoul 187.9ms 192.7ms 403.3ms 188.7ms 223.5ms 229.5ms 1.33ms 0.3595% 100%
Tokyo 146.4ms 148.3ms 309.5ms 147.0ms 147.7ms 186.4ms 1.15ms 0.0584% 100%
Los Angeles 215.2ms 220.5ms 998.1ms 216.0ms 237.3ms 257.2ms 1.23ms 0.0409% 100%
Chicago 250.8ms 258.8ms 418.2ms 257.0ms 261.4ms 299.8ms 1.12ms 0.0094% 100%
Paris 341.0ms 343.0ms 504.4ms 341.7ms 342.5ms 381.7ms 1.14ms 0.0109% 100%
Frankfurt 337.4ms 344.3ms 497.3ms 339.6ms 360.9ms 381.9ms 1.13ms 0.0117% 100%
Amsterdam 333.0ms 344.7ms 987.5ms 339.4ms 361.9ms 382.2ms 1.17ms 0.0354% 100%
London 335.5ms 341.3ms 494.7ms 336.3ms 357.7ms 378.5ms 1.12ms 0.0131% 100%
Stockholm 350.8ms 378.4ms 536.6ms 377.4ms 379.3ms 417.5ms 1.13ms 0.0656% 100%
Sydney2 47.6ms 49.5ms 211.8ms 48.2ms 48.9ms 88.6ms 1.14ms 0.0027% 100%
Loss timeline

24 hours, five minutes per cell

No loss< 0.01%0.01 – 0.1%0.1 – 1%> 1%No data
Perth
Sydney
Singapore
Seoul
Tokyo
Los Angeles
Chicago
Paris
Frankfurt
Amsterdam
London
Stockholm
Sydney2
00:0006:0012:0018:0024:00
Incidents

Worst events of the day

Consecutive minutes with packet loss or missing data, ranked by packets lost.

WindowEndpointDuration Packets lostLossCoverage
18:32 – 00:00 Seoul 328 min 2,605 1.324%
15:49 – 15:50 Los Angeles 1 min 254 42.333%
00:00 – 00:29 Seoul 29 min 244 1.402%
19:52 – 20:17 Tokyo 25 min 156 1.04%
01:58 – 02:00 Stockholm 2 min 148 12.333%
04:07 – 04:10 Stockholm 3 min 141 7.833%
23:35 – 23:37 Stockholm 2 min 96 8%
19:03 – 19:25 Tokyo 22 min 92 0.697%
23:35 – 23:37 Amsterdam 2 min 88 7.333%
19:53 – 20:14 Singapore 21 min 85 0.675%
00:49 – 00:56 Sydney 7 min 65 1.548%
20:27 – 20:43 Tokyo 16 min 58 0.604%
Over the day

Latency by endpoint

Perth
0134
Superloop
Sydney
0193958
Superloop
Singapore
075150226
Superloop
Seoul
084168252
Superloop
Tokyo
055111166
Superloop
Los Angeles
089178267
Superloop
Chicago
0119239358
Superloop
Paris
0128257385
Superloop
Frankfurt
0135270405
Superloop
Amsterdam
0137274411
Superloop
London
0134268402
Superloop
Stockholm
0142284426
Superloop
Sydney2
0193756
Superloop
Methodology

How these numbers were produced

Every ISP in this report is measured on identical hardware, with an identical probe configuration, through the same nbn FTTP NTD at the same premises, over the same time window. Each ISP terminates on its own UNI-D port.

  • ProbeUDP to port 1337, 10 packets per second per endpoint, 1000ms timeout.
  • BucketCounters aggregated in 60-second buckets.
  • LossPacket loss is the sum of reset-safe counter deltas. Buckets where a counter decreases are treated as an agent restart and excluded rather than counted as loss.
  • CoverageCoverage is delivered samples divided by expected samples. Missing data is reported as a gap, never as zero loss.
  • Percentilesp50/p95/p99 are computed over the full day of samples, not averaged from buckets. Approximate (t-digest) quantiles.
  • TimeoutsA sample with latency <= 0 or null is a timeout.
  • RankingEndpoints are ranked ordinally. No weighted composite score is used.
  • Ingest delay75s ingest settling delay applied before a day is generated.

Scope. This is a single-premises measurement against one nbn point of interconnect. It reflects each ISP’s backhaul, peering and congestion as experienced at this location on this date. It is not a nationwide comparison, and results at other locations may differ. All four UNI-D ports share the same physical fibre and GPON access path, so access-network conditions affect every ISP equally and cancel out of the comparison.

Generated 2026-09-24T00:15:40+08:00. The complete underlying dataset for this report is published as JSON.