Daily ISP report

Friday 11 September 2026

Superloop — UNI-D1 on nbn FTTP

Midnight to midnight, Australia/Perth · Browse all reports

Packet loss0.2039%22,905 of 11,231,987 packets
Data coverage100%0 endpoint-minutes with gaps
Endpoints won0 / 13Lowest average latency
Avg latency rank3.08Across all endpoints
Incidents737Loss or coverage events
Counter resets0Agent restarts excluded from loss
By endpoint

Latency and packet loss, past 24 hours

Min, average and max are the headline numbers. The percentiles sit beside them because a single spike moves an average — p95 means 95% of packets were faster than this.

EndpointMinAvgMax p50p95p99Jitter LossCoverage
Perth best 1.5ms 3.5ms 109.3ms 2.2ms 3.1ms 42.0ms 1.18ms 0.0075% 100%
Sydney 47.4ms 49.4ms 155.1ms 48.1ms 49.4ms 88.7ms 1.18ms 0.006% 100%
Singapore 195.9ms 197.9ms 304.0ms 196.6ms 197.5ms 236.5ms 1.18ms 0.0366% 100%
Seoul 176.8ms 187.5ms 372.2ms 188.4ms 217.6ms 242.4ms 1.26ms 1.9832% 100%
Tokyo 146.5ms 148.3ms 254.5ms 147.1ms 147.9ms 186.9ms 1.18ms 0.0222% 100%
Los Angeles 194.1ms 217.3ms 352.7ms 215.9ms 220.8ms 255.9ms 1.29ms 0.1056% 100%
Chicago 237.0ms 259.5ms 442.6ms 258.5ms 259.5ms 298.0ms 1.18ms 0.1001% 100%
Paris 341.9ms 344.0ms 449.5ms 342.7ms 343.6ms 382.8ms 1.18ms 0.0071% 100%
Frankfurt 339.0ms 341.5ms 521.7ms 340.0ms 345.1ms 380.6ms 1.17ms 0.0938% 100%
Amsterdam 338.6ms 341.7ms 526.0ms 340.1ms 346.2ms 381.3ms 1.22ms 0.1564% 100%
London 335.4ms 338.2ms 967.3ms 336.7ms 341.5ms 376.6ms 1.18ms 0.0471% 100%
Stockholm 356.0ms 379.4ms 548.7ms 378.1ms 379.2ms 418.5ms 1.18ms 0.0796% 100%
Sydney2 47.6ms 49.6ms 434.1ms 48.3ms 49.4ms 88.5ms 1.19ms 0.0059% 100%
Loss timeline

24 hours, five minutes per cell

No loss< 0.01%0.01 – 0.1%0.1 – 1%> 1%No data
Perth
Sydney
Singapore
Seoul
Tokyo
Los Angeles
Chicago
Paris
Frankfurt
Amsterdam
London
Stockholm
Sydney2
00:0006:0012:0018:0024:00
Incidents

Worst events of the day

Consecutive minutes with packet loss or missing data, ranked by packets lost.

WindowEndpointDuration Packets lostLossCoverage
15:52 – 16:03 Seoul 11 min 3,770 57.121%
11:49 – 12:00 Seoul 11 min 2,646 40.091%
12:29 – 12:40 Seoul 11 min 2,330 35.303%
14:49 – 15:00 Seoul 11 min 2,290 34.697%
13:11 – 13:16 Seoul 5 min 1,876 62.533%
09:02 – 09:07 Seoul 5 min 1,291 43.033%
09:32 – 09:39 Seoul 7 min 762 18.143%
10:35 – 10:38 Amsterdam 3 min 761 42.278%
10:31 – 10:35 Seoul 4 min 712 29.667%
15:15 – 15:20 Seoul 5 min 644 21.467%
12:49 – 12:52 Chicago 3 min 571 31.722%
10:38 – 10:42 Seoul 4 min 563 23.458%
Over the day

Latency by endpoint

Perth
0134
Superloop
Sydney
0193857
Superloop
Singapore
074148222
Superloop
Seoul
098197295
Superloop
Tokyo
055111166
Superloop
Los Angeles
083166249
Superloop
Chicago
097194292
Superloop
Paris
0129257386
Superloop
Frankfurt
0129259388
Superloop
Amsterdam
0140280421
Superloop
London
0128256384
Superloop
Stockholm
0142284426
Superloop
Sydney2
0193856
Superloop
Methodology

How these numbers were produced

Every ISP in this report is measured on identical hardware, with an identical probe configuration, through the same nbn FTTP NTD at the same premises, over the same time window. Each ISP terminates on its own UNI-D port.

  • ProbeUDP to port 1337, 10 packets per second per endpoint, 1000ms timeout.
  • BucketCounters aggregated in 60-second buckets.
  • LossPacket loss is the sum of reset-safe counter deltas. Buckets where a counter decreases are treated as an agent restart and excluded rather than counted as loss.
  • CoverageCoverage is delivered samples divided by expected samples. Missing data is reported as a gap, never as zero loss.
  • Percentilesp50/p95/p99 are computed over the full day of samples, not averaged from buckets. Approximate (t-digest) quantiles.
  • TimeoutsA sample with latency <= 0 or null is a timeout.
  • RankingEndpoints are ranked ordinally. No weighted composite score is used.
  • Ingest delay75s ingest settling delay applied before a day is generated.

Scope. This is a single-premises measurement against one nbn point of interconnect. It reflects each ISP’s backhaul, peering and congestion as experienced at this location on this date. It is not a nationwide comparison, and results at other locations may differ. All four UNI-D ports share the same physical fibre and GPON access path, so access-network conditions affect every ISP equally and cancel out of the comparison.

Generated 2026-09-12T00:15:23+08:00. The complete underlying dataset for this report is published as JSON.